On March 28, 193, Emperor Pertinax of Rome was assassinated by the Praetorian Guard, a powerful military unit responsible for the protection of Roman emperors. The Praetorian Guard had originally placed Pertinax on the throne but grew frustrated with his attempts to implement strict financial reforms, which they found too burdensome. After his death, the Guard, uncertain about who should be the next emperor, resorted to a simple and pragmatic method—selling the imperial title to the highest bidder. This event highlighted the growing influence of military power and the fragility of imperial rule during that period. In modern times, the relationship between political leadership and financial markets has become increasingly complex. A presidential election is currently taking place under significant pressure from financial markets, which are seen as influential actors in shaping economic policy. This pressure is not merely economic but carries deep political implications, as it reflects a broader struggle over the direction of national policy. The so-called "return to reality" refers to a shift in political discourse that emphasizes fiscal responsibility and market stability. However, this shift is not just about economic concerns—it is also a political maneuver aimed at dismantling the post-war social model, which was built around strong state intervention and social welfare programs. Critics argue that this approach threatens to undo decades of progress in areas such as healthcare, education, and labor rights. This tension between financial markets and social policies is a central theme in current political debates. As leaders seek to balance economic pressures with the needs of their citizens, the outcome of the election may determine whether the post-war social model is preserved or replaced by a more market-driven approach.