A philosopher has raised concerns about the impact of artificial intelligence on humanities research, suggesting that AI tools are shifting the role of scholars from active researchers to "supervisors" of technology. This change, the philosopher argues, may weaken the traditional authority and influence of humanities scholars in academic settings. The concern stems from the increasing use of AI in tasks such as text analysis, data processing, and even content creation, which were once the domain of human researchers. The philosopher emphasizes that while AI can enhance research efficiency, it risks reducing the depth and originality of human scholarship. If researchers become primarily responsible for overseeing AI systems rather than engaging in original thought and analysis, the core mission of the humanities—understanding human culture, history, and values—could be compromised. This shift may also lead to a devaluation of the skills and expertise that humanities scholars have traditionally brought to academic discourse. The philosopher's remarks come at a time when AI is rapidly transforming various fields, including education and research. While some view this as an opportunity for innovation and expanded access to knowledge, others warn of unintended consequences, such as the marginalization of human expertise. The debate highlights the need for thoughtful integration of AI into academia, ensuring that it supports rather than supplants human intellectual contributions. As the use of AI in research continues to grow, the philosopher calls for a critical examination of its long-term effects on the humanities. They suggest that this current phase of AI-assisted research may be temporary, and that the academic community must remain vigilant in preserving the unique value of human scholarship. This discussion is likely to shape future policies and practices in higher education and research institutions.