On Sunday, September 13, the former Minister of Economy was invited to appear before the Grand Jury, where he once again brought up his controversial proposal to enroll children in school starting at the age of one. The idea, which he first introduced during his time in office, sparked significant debate and criticism from educators, parents, and child development experts. His suggestion aimed to integrate early childhood education more formally into the national system, but many argued that such a policy could be detrimental to young children's emotional and psychological development. The proposal, which suggested starting formal schooling as early as age one, was met with strong opposition from various sectors. Critics pointed out that children at such a young age require more play-based learning and parental interaction rather than structured academic instruction. Many experts warned that enforcing school attendance so early could lead to stress and hinder natural developmental milestones. Despite this, the former minister maintained that early education could provide long-term benefits, such as improved cognitive development and better preparation for future learning. The Grand Jury session provided a platform for legal and ethical discussions around the proposal. While the minister reiterated his stance, the panel raised questions about the feasibility and potential consequences of implementing such a policy. There were calls for more research and consultation with child psychologists and educators before any such policy could be considered. The session highlighted the complexity of balancing educational reform with the well-being of young children. As the debate continues, the proposal remains a divisive topic in public discourse. While some see it as a progressive step toward early education reform, others view it as an overreach that could negatively impact children's development. The former minister's appearance before the Grand Jury has reignited the conversation, leaving the future of such policies uncertain as more voices are heard and more data is considered.