French presidential candidates are proposing a wide range of approaches to the retirement age, reflecting differing political priorities and visions for the future of the country's social policies. On the left and with the far-right National Rally, candidates are pushing for an earlier retirement age, with some suggesting as low as 60 or 62 years old. These proposals aim to ease the burden on workers and align with a broader social agenda that emphasizes the rights of older workers and the need for greater flexibility in employment. In contrast, center-right candidate Edouard Philippe has advocated for maintaining a retirement age of 65 or 66, arguing that such a policy is necessary due to France's demographic challenges and financial constraints. He emphasizes that an aging population and a shrinking workforce require careful planning to ensure the sustainability of the pension system. His stance reflects a more cautious approach, focusing on long-term economic stability and the need to balance public finances. Meanwhile, Gabriel Attal, a younger and more centrist candidate, has proposed a radical shift by suggesting the abolition of the legal retirement age altogether. This idea would allow individuals to retire whenever they choose, without being bound by a set age. His proposal is seen as a way to promote individual freedom and adapt to changing work patterns, including the rise of flexible and remote work. These varied proposals highlight the deep divisions over how to address France’s aging population and the future of its pension system. As the election approaches, the debate over retirement age is likely to remain a central issue in the national conversation on social policy and economic planning.