Over ten days, more than 6,600 individuals, many of them minors, were arrested in a widespread operation that has drawn sharp criticism from legal professionals. Lawyers have condemned the approach taken by authorities, describing it as a "logic of maintaining order that is completely inappropriate." They argue that the methods used to enforce order have led to situations that are not only deplorable but may also be illegal. The detentions have raised serious concerns about the treatment of those arrested. Reports suggest that many were held in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions, with limited access to basic necessities like food, water, and medical care. These conditions have been described as inhumane by human rights organizations and legal experts, who are calling for an independent investigation into the treatment of detainees. Legal representatives have emphasized that while maintaining public order is important, the means used must comply with international human rights standards. They have pointed out that the use of mass arrests without due process or adequate legal safeguards may violate fundamental rights, particularly for minors who are more vulnerable to abuse and mistreatment. The controversy has sparked broader discussions about the balance between security and civil liberties. Advocates for reform are urging authorities to review their policies and ensure that any measures taken to maintain order are both lawful and proportionate. As the situation continues to unfold, the focus remains on ensuring that the rights of all individuals, especially those detained, are protected.