Several Australian local councils have introduced bans on AI smart glasses in public spaces such as pools and playgrounds, citing concerns about privacy and safety. The move comes after reports of unauthorized filming and online sharing of such footage, particularly involving women and children. In Canterbury-Bankstown, Mayor Bilal El-Hayek referred to the devices as "pervert glasses," noting community concerns raised on social media and forums about predators and paedophiles potentially using the technology to secretly film in sensitive areas like change rooms and schools. AI smart glasses are wearable devices that include high-resolution cameras and advanced AI features, such as real-time translation, object recognition, and audio capabilities. These devices can record video, scan faces, and share information about individuals. Brisbane was the first Australian council to ban covert filming at public pools, aiming to protect children from potential harm. Tom Sulston from Digital Rights Watch supported the decision, highlighting the importance of ensuring public spaces remain free from unwanted surveillance. Yarra Council in Melbourne followed with similar restrictions, banning smart glasses from its aquatic facilities, childcare centers, and playgrounds. It also plans to push for stronger national privacy laws. Randwick Council in Sydney's eastern suburbs implemented a ban at a local leisure center, citing community concerns. Signs now ask individuals wearing smart glasses to remove them or leave the premises. These restrictions do not apply to people with vision impairments who rely on the technology for accessibility. Federal Attorney General Michelle Rowland has not ruled out a national ban but has acknowledged the complexity of regulating such emerging technology. In August, she requested the privacy commissioner, Carly Kind, to prioritize the issue. Australia's online safety regulator has advised smart glasses companies to automatically blur faces in videos and make it clear when someone is recording. The eSafety commissioner’s office warned that while these devices can offer benefits for accessibility, they also raise significant privacy and safety concerns, leading to growing public scrutiny.