Gubernatorial candidates across the U.S. are increasingly focusing on artificial intelligence (AI), a rapidly advancing technology with the potential to reshape industries, jobs, and daily life. As debates over how to regulate AI grow more intense, candidates from both major political parties are pushing for state-level action, even as they admit they're still figuring out exactly what that action should look like. This shift comes as current governors from both parties, such as California’s Gavin Newsom and Florida’s Ron DeSantis, have made AI regulation a key priority, setting the stage for candidates to align with these efforts. Most of the candidates contacted by POLITICO expressed support for states taking the lead in regulating AI, highlighting their frustration with the federal government’s lack of action. They cited concerns ranging from job displacement and fraud to the safety of children. However, many have yet to outline specific policies or strategies for managing the technology’s risks. This reflects a challenge for candidates: while their previous messaging on AI had focused on the impact of data centers on energy prices, they now face the more complex task of addressing AI’s broader societal implications as the November election approaches. Democratic candidates like Gina Hinojosa of Texas and Xavier Becerra of California have emphasized the need for state-level oversight, arguing that the federal government has failed to act and that corporate interests should not dictate regulation. Meanwhile, some Republican candidates, such as Steve Hilton of California, acknowledge the need for regulation but question the extent of the threat AI poses. Across the political spectrum, there’s a growing recognition that AI is no longer just a technological issue but one that touches on public safety, privacy, and economic stability. The push for state-level AI regulation is also gaining momentum as voters increasingly view AI as an existential threat. A recent POLITICO poll found that a majority of voters believe AI could pose a risk to humanity, and many support a pause in the development of advanced AI models. In response, the National Governors Association is set to release a policy roadmap for governors in November, aiming to guide both current and incoming state leaders on how to address AI’s challenges. At the same time, the Trump administration has resisted state-level AI regulation, advocating instead for federal preemption. However, several states, including Utah and Georgia, have passed or are considering laws that contradict this approach. This growing divergence highlights a broader trend: as federal action remains stalled, state and local leaders are stepping in to shape the future of AI regulation, reflecting a complex and evolving political landscape.