A Liberal Party official has denied claims that he provided evidence suggesting Dominic Perrottet’s sister-in-law, Anita Perrottet, received $660,999 in payments for offering a "mum’s perspective" on lobbying clients, according to the New South Wales anti-corruption watchdog, the Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac). During a hearing on Wednesday, Jeremy Greenwood, a Liberal MP and former minister, told Icac that it was not relevant that Anita Perrottet’s children were under five at the time she supposedly gave advice on vaping among minors. Greenwood also denied giving false evidence about her coining the term "zero unnecessary euthanasia," which appeared in a greyhound industry report years before he claimed she used it. Icac is currently investigating allegations that Greenwood, along with Charles Perrottet and Christian Ellis, shared in $2 million in payments from fugitive developer Jean Nassif or his company, Toplace, between 2020 and 2023 in exchange for political favors. Greenwood and Charles Perrottet have previously denied these payments were political donations. The inquiry was reignited after Nassif appeared in a video from his home in Beirut, denying any corruption. During the hearing, lawyer Peggy Dwyer questioned Greenwood about his earlier testimony regarding advice Anita Perrottet allegedly gave to lobbying firms controlled by Greenwood and Ellis. Dwyer pointed out that invoices totaling $660,999 paid to Macquarie Consulting, Anita’s company, could be Charles Perrottet’s share of the money from Nassif. Anita Perrottet has said the payments were for "strategic and marketing advice," while Charles Perrottet described them as covering both his and his wife’s work. Greenwood previously claimed that Anita’s advice, which Icac has no written record of, provided a "mum’s perspective." He suggested she may have coined the term "zero unnecessary euthanasia" for greyhounds and advised on preventing minors from vaping, including removing flavors like bubblegum. Dwyer challenged Greenwood’s claim, noting that the phrase had already appeared in a 2017 greyhound industry report. Greenwood denied the suggestion that he fabricated evidence, and he stated he had read a Philip Morris submission about vaping regulation, but he maintained his account. The inquiry continues, with further details expected as the investigation unfolds.