One year after the establishment of a ceasefire and the signing of a peace agreement proposed by the United States, the Gaza Strip continues to face a dire situation. Despite the hope that the deal would bring stability, the region remains heavily reliant on humanitarian aid, and many of the promises made by former U.S. President Donald Trump's peace plan have not been fulfilled. The agreement, which was intended to ease the humanitarian crisis and pave the way for a lasting peace, has not led to the expected improvements in living conditions or security for the people of Gaza. The situation in Gaza has been marked by ongoing conflict and political instability, with periodic escalations of violence between Palestinian groups and Israeli forces. The humanitarian aid that flows into the region is often limited by restrictions and blockades, making it difficult for essential supplies like food, water, and medical care to reach those in need. Many residents live in overcrowded conditions with limited access to basic services, and the economy remains in a state of stagnation. The peace plan proposed by the Trump administration aimed to address these issues by offering incentives to both Israeli and Palestinian leaders to reach a resolution. However, critics argue that the plan did not adequately address the core issues of territorial disputes, security concerns, and the rights of Palestinian citizens. As a result, the plan has been widely seen as lacking in practicality and missing key components necessary for a lasting peace. Despite international calls for a more comprehensive approach to resolving the conflict, the situation in Gaza remains unresolved. The people of the region continue to live under challenging conditions, with little progress toward the peace and stability that was once hoped for. The international community is now looking for new strategies and diplomatic efforts to address the ongoing crisis and bring about a sustainable solution.