Bill amendment removed

On Thursday, October 22, the National Assembly removed a clause from the social security financing bill that would have extended a tax on sugary products. The amendment was defeated by a vote of 86 to 58, largely due to support from right-wing and far-right deputies.

Tax proposal details

The proposed tax aimed to penalize foods high in sugar, such as cakes, candies, cereals, spreads, and chocolate bars. The tax rate would increase with the sugar content, starting at 10 grams of sugar per 100 grams of product. The government estimated the tax could generate 300 million euros annually.

Government's justification

Health Minister Stéphanie Rist defended the tax as an "incentive tax" designed to encourage manufacturers to reduce sugar in their products. She warned that 80% of children in France consume excessive amounts of sugar, leading to potential chronic diseases like diabetes and cardiovascular issues.

Opposition arguments

Several deputies opposed the tax, arguing it would disproportionately affect lower-income families. Christophe Bentz of the Rassemblement National criticized the government for focusing on consumption-based taxes, while Nicolas Tryzna of the Republican Right noted that 75% of obese children come from modest backgrounds.

Impact concerns

Deputies also questioned the tax's effectiveness in changing consumer behavior. Justine Gruet of the Republican Right argued the tax would burden purchasing power without significantly reducing sugar consumption. Despite these concerns, the amendment was removed, though the tax may still be considered in future budget discussions.

Future uncertainty

Although the amendment was rejected, the government has not ruled out reintroducing the tax in 2027. The final version of the budget will depend on ongoing debates in the National Assembly.