A court press release stated that five handwritten signatures and mentions of candidates from the Noisy au Cœur list, a citizen initiative submitted on March 17, did not meet the requirements of the electoral code. This list had been formed by merging two other candidate lists. The issue arises because the electoral code requires that such signatures and mentions be collected directly by the candidates themselves. The court found that the five signatures and candidate mentions were not collected by the candidates as required by law. This means that the candidates may not have personally participated in the process of gathering support for the Noisy au Cœur list. Such a requirement ensures that candidates are actively involved in the campaign and have a direct connection with the voters who support them. The Noisy au Cœur list was formed by merging two other lists, which may have complicated the process of collecting signatures and mentions. The court’s ruling highlights the importance of following the electoral code to ensure fair and transparent elections. This case serves as a reminder of the legal requirements that candidates must follow when gathering support for their candidacy. The court's decision could have implications for the validity of the Noisy au Cœur list and the candidates associated with it. If the list is deemed invalid, it may affect the election results and the representation of the candidates involved. This case underscores the need for strict adherence to electoral laws and procedures to maintain the integrity of the electoral process.