Douglas Stewart Carter, a man who had spent 41 years on death row in Utah, was recently released on bail. He was originally convicted in 1985 and again in 1992 for the murder of a woman. His release came after new DNA testing and statements from two witnesses who had previously accused him. These witnesses admitted they had been paid by the police to testify against him. A new trial is set for 2027, which could potentially clear Carter of the charges or lead to a different outcome. Carter's case has drawn attention from various media outlets, including the French podcast Affaire suivante. In a recent episode, the podcast’s hosts, Pauline Revenaz and Charlotte Lesage, invited Me Romain Ruiz, a criminal lawyer based in Paris, to discuss the implications of the case. They examined how testimony, particularly from witnesses, plays a crucial role in U.S. criminal proceedings. The discussion also touched on how Carter could have remained on death row for such an extended period despite the possibility of his innocence. The podcast episode delved into the legal system’s handling of cases where evidence might be flawed or unreliable. Me Romain Ruiz explained the complexities of the U.S. justice system, particularly in states like Utah, where the death penalty is still practiced. The conversation highlighted the potential for wrongful convictions and the importance of re-examining old cases with modern forensic techniques and new information. Carter’s long detention has also raised questions about the conditions of death row in the United States. The discussion on Affaire suivante included reflections on the psychological and physical toll of such prolonged incarceration. As the new trial approaches, the case continues to serve as a reminder of the need for reform and the ongoing pursuit of justice in the legal system.