AI adoption is widespread but unpopular

A survey by FGS Global found that 71% of respondents from seven countries have used at least one AI tool in the past six months. Despite this high adoption rate, only 18% of respondents hold a positive view of AI, far below the public perception of technologies like search engines and smartphones.

Public and political views on AI are divided

Political leaders and experts are split on how to regulate AI, with growing concerns about the risks, especially the potential loss of human control over AI systems. In the United States, Republicans are more favorable toward AI than Democrats, but the key factor appears to be voter participation, with non-voters expressing less enthusiasm.

Global AI competition lacks public support

The global race between the United States and China for AI dominance is not widely supported. Two-thirds of respondents do not prioritize AI competitiveness, and a majority in both the United States and other countries believe the competition will ultimately be harmful to the world, regardless of the outcome.

Public supports AI sovereignty but doubts its feasibility

A majority of respondents believe AI sovereignty is important, with 76% considering it a priority. However, confidence in the ability of European, Canadian, and Japanese experts to compete with China or the United States in advanced AI models is low. Some Japanese officials suggest focusing on targeted strategies instead of competing at the model level.

Regulation is on the agenda but lacks consensus

AI regulation is being discussed in all seven countries, but there is no agreement on the principles or methods of regulation. Public opinion strongly rejects self-regulation, with only 7% supporting industry-led safety measures. The most popular approach is requiring government approval of new AI models with independent testing.

Experts suggest ways to improve AI's public image

Experts recommend improving the AI sector's image through certification, labeling, transparency, and enforceable codes of conduct. They also suggest highlighting AI's benefits in scientific and health-related fields. However, the lack of public confidence in AI remains a major obstacle to changing political opinions or regulatory efforts.