Students are being encouraged to return to high schools in France, but security services have raised concerns about a possible increase in violence. The situation is seen as complicated, with two different perspectives emerging: one sees it as a struggle for access to education, while the other views it as a group of individuals taking advantage of the circumstances to cause unrest. The progressive movement has been criticized by LFI, a political party, and its associated media, who accuse it of spreading propaganda. Pierre-Henri Tavoyau, an academic, pointed out that there have been 10 years of university blockades and a long-standing tradition of opposing the state in France. While not openly discussed, an identity-related aspect is evident on social media. Some students are eager to continue their studies, but for many, the issue goes beyond education—it is about rejecting the French state and its institutions. Bruno Retailleau, a prominent political figure, stated that while France Insoumise, a political party, cannot be officially banned, it must be actively opposed. He emphasized that the state has both the right and responsibility to use force to protect high school students who wish to attend classes and pursue their futures. He also stressed that violence should come with consequences, and those engaging in riots must understand the risks they are taking. The financial impact of the unrest has already been significant, with the cost of the violence estimated at several million euros in just the first week. As the situation continues to develop, the balance between protecting students' right to education and maintaining public safety remains a pressing concern for authorities.