Scientists who contributed to the text expressed concern that food industry companies have the option not to display a specific health-related logo, even though it could be beneficial for public health. This logo, designed to inform consumers about the nutritional content of products, is not mandatory for companies to use. The scientists argue that its optional nature may limit its effectiveness in helping people make healthier food choices. The text in question is now under review by a committee at the National Assembly, which is responsible for evaluating proposed changes to legislation and policy. The committee will consider the scientists' concerns and determine whether the logo should be made mandatory or if other measures should be taken to ensure that consumers receive accurate nutritional information. The discussion around the logo reflects a broader debate about how to improve transparency in the food industry and empower consumers with better information. Some argue that making the logo mandatory would lead to greater awareness of health-related product details, while others believe that such measures could be seen as overly regulatory. The outcome of the committee's review could have significant implications for public health policy and the way food products are labeled in the future. As the committee examines the text, it will weigh the potential benefits of increased consumer awareness against the concerns of the food industry and other stakeholders.