Soda sales have dropped among people who use food stamps, following changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which provides food assistance to low-income individuals. The Trump administration supported states in applying for waivers that would prevent SNAP recipients from using their benefits to buy sugary foods like soda and candy. These waivers were approved in 23 states, though a federal judge blocked five of them from taking effect. A recent study by researchers from Stanford University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the University of Chicago examined the first 10 states that implemented these restrictions. The findings showed that SNAP recipients in these states bought 12.4 percent fewer sugary drinks, which translates to about 34 fewer 12-ounce cans per person per year. In states that only partially restricted sugary drinks—such as banning soda but allowing fruit or energy drinks—SNAP households often switched to the beverages that remained permitted. Initially, it was assumed that SNAP recipients would simply use their own money to buy soda if their benefits couldn’t cover it. However, the study suggests that many treat their SNAP benefits as a separate budget and may avoid purchasing sugary drinks altogether if they can't use their benefits for them. This aligns with recent research that indicates such restrictions may discourage purchases rather than just shift spending. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. praised the restrictions, stating in an August 2025 statement that SNAP has historically used taxpayer money to fund unhealthy products like soda and candy, which contribute to chronic diseases like diabetes. He emphasized that the waivers help refocus SNAP on providing real food and empower states to improve public health. The study also estimated that a nationwide ban on purchasing sugary drinks with SNAP benefits could save about $1.1 billion annually. Around 70 percent of these savings would come from reduced healthcare costs, as the restrictions could lead to weight loss and a lower risk of type 2 diabetes among SNAP recipients. However, the researchers warned that such restrictions may increase feelings of stigma among beneficiaries. Many reported feeling judged, disrespected, or deprived of personal freedom when using their benefits. The debate around these policies highlights the complex balance between public health goals and the need to respect the autonomy and dignity of those who rely on food assistance programs.