Political activity is on the rise, with new movements forming and more public debates being organized, as noted in a recent report. In the context of upcoming elections, five candidates have officially entered the race for the PS (French Socialist Party) primary. This development has sparked discussions about the implications of early campaigning on the democratic process and the nature of political debate. On the right side of the political spectrum, there is growing pressure to organize a primary election as well. This push reflects a broader trend of increasing political engagement and a desire for more structured competition among candidates. Some argue that holding primaries could lead to more transparency and stronger candidate selection, while others worry it may shift focus away from policy issues to media exposure and personal branding. The potential for an early start to the campaign season has raised questions about its impact on political discourse. Some experts suggest that starting early could allow for more in-depth discussions on key issues, while others fear it might lead to superficial debates centered around media presence and personal attacks rather than substantive policy proposals. Pablo Pillaud-Vivien, editor-in-chief of the magazine Regards, and Dominique de Montvalon, a political editorialist, have been examining these developments closely. In their discussions, they explore the balance between fostering political engagement and preserving the integrity of democratic debate. Their analysis highlights the need for a careful approach to campaign timing and structure to ensure that the political process remains both competitive and meaningful.