Recent judicial decisions highlight the response to violence committed in pharmacies, with the role of the Order in procedures initiated after an attack requiring further understanding. The steps to take after a threat or violence follow a specific framework, and several devices allow anticipating risks and strengthening the security of the team. Two cases recently judged illustrate the judicial response to violence in pharmacies. In the Doubs, an individual wearing a hood and armed robbed two pharmacies on 28 November 2025 and 1st April 2026. After stealing money and several medicines, including specialities containing codeine, he committed violence against the teams. The victims described the lasting consequences of these attacks on their personal and professional lives. On 17 June 2026, the juvenile court of Besançon sentenced him to five years in prison, of which three years with a suspended sentence, with a warrant for detention. He will also have to compensate the pharmacists victims for their moral damages. The action of the Order, which became a civil party to defend the collective damage suffered by the profession, was declared admissible. In Orleans, a pharmacist was threatened on 6 May 2025 by an armed individual who demanded the delivery of benzodiazepines without a prescription. A preparator was also insulted and received spit on her face. On 19 January 2026, the correctional court of Orleans sentenced the perpetrator to eight months in prison and a three-year ban from appearing in the pharmacy. The civil parties were compensated, and the action of the Order was also declared admissible. For the Cnop, these two cases mainly remind the importance of filing a complaint to allow an appropriate criminal response. Victim of an attack should first report the facts to the Order. The report can be made from the pharmacist's personal account on the Cnop website. It allows documenting the attacks of which pharmacists and their teams are victims. The report can also trigger the support of the network of security referents, who can answer the pharmacist's questions and guide them in their procedures, especially when considering filing a complaint. The Cnop reminds that this network is available to professionals facing an attack or a threat situation. Reporting to the Order does not replace a complaint to the police. These two procedures have different objectives. The report allows the Order to track and document the phenomenon; the complaint allows submitting to the justice. The figures published by the Order show that there is still a significant margin. In 2025, 468 attacks were reported to the Cnop, of which 451 in the pharmacy. But only 28.8% of the reported facts had led to a complaint. Under-reporting remains significant. Becoming a civil party allows the victim to assert their damage within the framework of the criminal procedure and to request its compensation. The two decisions highlighted by the Cnop also show that the Order itself can become a civil party. This intervention aims to defend the collective damage suffered by the profession when the facts affect the practice of pharmacy. In the two recent cases, the action of the Order was declared admissible. The pharmacist victim must, as far as possible, keep the elements allowing to document the facts: precise circumstances of the attack, testimonies, possible injuries or medical consultations, consequences on the activity and elements proving the damage suffered. The trauma should not be minimized when there is no physical injury. In 2025, 380 reports mentioned a psychological impact, i.e., more than 83% of the attacks recorded by the Order. Prevention constitutes the other aspect of the approach. The owner can request a free safety audit from the national police or the gendarmerie. The safety referent examines notably the accesses, the external environment, the video surveillance, the sensitive products and the organization of the pharmacy, then formulates adapted recommendations. The audit also covers the sales areas, the counter, the areas reserved for staff, the preparation of prescriptions and the storage of medicines. It is recommended to plan about 1 h 30 to 2 hours for the visit. The pharmacist can also get to know the police forces. In gendarmerie areas, the Operation tranquillity businesses and commerce (Otec) and the SIDPP base allow notably to report a threatened profession. In police areas, an inscription in Pegase can be requested from the local police station. The training of teams in conflict and attack management constitutes another lever. It allows to work on de-escalation techniques and the reflexes to adopt in the face of an aggressive behavior. The Cnop finally reminds that it provides pharmacists with a series of tools on attacks, thefts and difficult situations: booklet "Reflexes after an attack", security advice, poster on the penalties, FAQ and flowchart presenting the different steps to follow after an attack. For the owner, the user manual can therefore be summarized in a few reflexes: secure the people, have the possible consequences noted, report the attack to the Order, file a complaint, keep the elements useful for the file and request a security referent. In advance, a safety audit and team preparation allow to reduce vulnerabilities. Beyond the two judicial decisions, the Cnop message is clear: a threat or an attack must not be normalized or left without follow-up. The report allows to document the facts. As for the complaint, it opens the way to a judicial response and the accompaniment of the Order can help the pharmacist to go through the different stages.