A moratorium, or a temporary ban, on commercial whaling was introduced in 1986 by the International Whaling Commission (IWC). This agreement aimed to protect whale populations by stopping the hunting of whales for commercial purposes. Despite this, three countries continue to engage in whaling, often citing cultural or scientific reasons. These nations are Japan, Norway, and Iceland, each of which has been involved in whaling activities despite the global ban. The current international summit in Australia is a significant event where representatives from various countries and organizations gather to discuss global environmental issues. Animal rights activists are using this platform to push for a permanent end to whaling, emphasizing the ethical and ecological concerns surrounding the practice. They argue that whales play a crucial role in marine ecosystems and that their continued hunting is both unnecessary and harmful. The activists hope that the summit will lead to stronger international cooperation and pressure on the three countries that still allow whaling. They are also calling for stricter enforcement of existing regulations and the potential revision of the IWC’s policies to reflect modern conservation values. This issue has long been a point of contention in international environmental discussions. The debate over whaling highlights the complex balance between cultural traditions and global conservation efforts. While some nations argue that whaling is part of their heritage or that it is conducted for scientific research, others maintain that these justifications do not outweigh the need to protect whale populations. As the summit continues, the outcome may influence future policies and the global stance on whaling.