During a time of increased student activism, the government has proposed new legislation that would hold individuals accountable for vandalism and also those who are present during the act. The bill, which is not entirely new, seeks to expand the scope of existing laws by introducing stricter penalties for both those who commit the act and those who are nearby. The proposed changes have raised concerns among legal experts, who argue that the expansion of liability could be unconstitutional. They suggest that the law may infringe on individual rights by holding people responsible for actions they did not personally commit. This has sparked debate about the balance between public safety and personal freedom. The government has defended the measure as a necessary response to the rise in youth-related incidents, claiming that it will deter potential offenders and protect public property. Officials emphasize that the law is intended to address the growing challenge of maintaining order in areas affected by student mobilization. Legal challenges are expected if the bill is passed, as civil rights organizations and advocacy groups prepare to argue that the expanded liability provisions violate constitutional protections. The outcome of this debate will likely influence how similar laws are interpreted and applied in the future.