A French economist has raised concerns about President Emmanuel Macron’s economic strategies, suggesting they may be contributing to the country’s growing national debt and increasing borrowing costs. Anthony Morlet-Lavidalie, an economist at Rexecode, a consulting firm specializing in economic and financial analysis, has pointed out that Macron’s policies, which focus on supply-side reforms—such as encouraging business investment and improving labor market flexibility—are being carried out through what he calls “his least restrictive measures.” This implies that the government may be avoiding more aggressive or controversial actions that could potentially disrupt the economy or face political resistance. France has been grappling with rising public debt in recent years, partly due to economic challenges exacerbated by the global pandemic and ongoing energy costs. The country's borrowing costs have also increased as international investors demand higher returns to compensate for the perceived risks of lending to France. Morlet-Lavidalie argues that Macron’s current approach may not be sufficient to address these challenges effectively, and that more decisive action might be necessary to stabilize the economy. Supply-side policies typically aim to boost economic growth by making it easier for businesses to operate, such as by reducing regulations or taxes. However, these policies can sometimes take time to show results and may not provide immediate relief for public finances. Morlet-Lavidalie’s comments come at a time when France is under pressure to balance economic growth with fiscal responsibility, particularly as it seeks to maintain its credibility in international financial markets. The economist’s critique adds to the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of Macron’s economic agenda. While the president has emphasized structural reforms to make France more competitive, critics argue that the pace and scope of these reforms have not kept up with the country’s financial challenges. As France continues to navigate a complex economic landscape, the discussion over the best path forward remains a key topic for policymakers and analysts alike.