Demonstrators gather against Google's data center

A thousand people gathered in a peaceful and musical demonstration at the site where Google plans to build a massive data center, expressing concerns about the project. The event was organized by the group « Ozans Dire Non », which brings together individuals who are skeptical of Google's promises and the environmental and social impacts of the project.

Event includes public engagement and dialogue

Despite initial checks by the gendarmerie, the demonstration proceeded with participants engaging in various activities, including information stands, meals, and three round table discussions. These discussions aimed to explore the concerns and questions raised by the local community regarding the project.

Participants walk to the future data center site

The afternoon began with a walk to the site where the data center buildings are expected to be completed by 2030. The walk took place under a high-voltage power line, one of the reasons Google chose Berry for its project. The procession included marchers of all ages, some with children and dogs, and walking musicians created a joyful atmosphere.

Protesters display strong opposition

A large banner reading « Not an acre for Google » was unfurled at the edge of the site, symbolizing the strong opposition from local residents. The procession included participants from a variety of political backgrounds, mostly left-wing, including environmentalists, rural groups, and local officials. Some participants avoided being photographed with political flags to distance themselves from the movement.

Concerns raised about environmental and economic impacts

Raphaël Tillie, an official from the Direction interdepartmental des routes Centre-Ouest (Dirco), pointed out several concerns related to the project. He highlighted the need to ask questions about water usage, heat emissions, electricity supply, and the number of jobs created. Heat from similar data centers has been known to raise local temperatures by two degrees, which could be a problem in an area already experiencing high temperatures.

Job creation and project oversight debated

Tillie also noted the difficulty in distinguishing between direct, indirect, and induced jobs during construction and those promised after the project is operational. He warned that the public debate commission should expect three months of lively discussions and emphasized the importance of incorporating the observations of local residents in the project's development and monitoring.