Judge Tomoko Akane of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has raised concerns about U.S. sanctions that have placed her on a list alongside traffickers and terrorists. She expressed unease at being associated with such groups, especially as someone dedicated to upholding the rule of law. Although the full impact of the sanctions has not yet been felt, Akane mentioned that her personal life is already being affected—her credit card was suspended immediately, and other judges have reportedly faced similar practical challenges, including some companies stopping their services. Akane emphasized her commitment to her role as president of the ICC, stating she would continue her duties until the end of her term. She questioned whether the Court is now facing its biggest challenge since its establishment in 2002. Notably, nine of the ICC’s 18 judges, along with two deputy prosecutors, a former prosecutor, and a staff member, have been sanctioned by the United States. Additionally, nine current and former judges—along with the entire ICC presidency—were condemned in absentia by Russia after the Court issued an arrest warrant for a Russian official. The situation has drawn comparisons to the Nuremberg trials, which established the foundation of modern international law by holding individuals accountable for war crimes. Meanwhile, in the Philippines, the Supreme Court is taking steps that could lead to the arrest of a former police chief, showing continued interest in justice at the national level. In another development, the removal of Karim Khan, the ICC’s former prosecutor, was described as a victory for the United States and Israel. These events highlight the complex interplay between international justice and national interests, as well as the challenges faced by institutions like the ICC in maintaining their independence and effectiveness amid geopolitical tensions.