Arrests disrupt mobilization efforts

Many people were forced to report to the police station on Saturday, October 31, and Sunday, November 1, preventing them from mobilizing. These actions were taken without prior communication from the authorities.

Authorities cite anti-terrorism laws

The authorities based their decisions on the legal provisions of anti-terrorism, which they claim justify the measures taken. These laws are often used to justify actions that limit certain freedoms during times of perceived threat.

Lack of transparency raises concerns

The lack of communication from the authorities about these measures has raised concerns among the public. Many feel that their rights to freedom of movement and assembly have been undermined without clear justification.

Public reaction is mixed

Some members of the public support the measures, believing they are necessary for national security. Others criticize the government for using anti-terrorism laws to suppress dissent or prevent organized protests.