In February 1991, a swift military campaign led by the United States and its allies resulted in the defeat of the Iraqi army and the liberation of Kuwait, which had been occupied by Iraq. This operation, known as Operation Desert Storm, showcased the overwhelming military power of the United States and left a lasting impression on the global stage. Now, thirty-five years later, the United States faces a different challenge: its inability to prevent the Islamic Republic of Iran (RII) from controlling the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global oil trade, after several months of conflict. This situation highlights the limitations of the American military model and raises questions about the effectiveness of strategic decision-making by the country's leaders. The conflict with Iran, which began in early 2026, had broad objectives, including the overthrow of the Iranian regime, the destruction of its nuclear program, and the dismantling of its ballistic missile capabilities. None of these goals have been achieved, and the focus has shifted to resolving a problem that many experts argue should have been anticipated. The RII, particularly the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (GRI), has effectively taken control of the Strait of Hormuz. This control allows Iran to impose tolls on commercial ships passing through the strait, generating significant economic benefits. The GRI has established a network of coastal bases and fortified islands on both sides of the strait, including Bandar Abbas, Qeshm, and Larak, which serve as key strategic points for controlling maritime traffic. Iran's control over the strait is supported by a robust military infrastructure, including conventional brigades, anti-air and anti-ship units, and a large number of mobile maritime forces such as fast boats, mini-submarines, and mine-laying vessels. These forces are capable of launching coordinated attacks on ships and disrupting navigation, which has effectively deterred many shipowners from attempting to avoid Iranian-controlled waters. This military presence has not only secured Iran's economic interests but also created a visible concern for American decision-makers, who now seek to restore the free navigation of the strait in accordance with international law. Since August 2026, the United States has considered three main options: renouncing the effort to free the strait, persuading Iran to do so, or taking control by force. The first option appears unlikely unless Iran offers significant concessions, such as a nuclear agreement. The second option, which has been pursued, involves applying economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran to comply with American demands. This has included offering financial incentives, such as unfreezing assets and lifting sanctions, in exchange for Iran's commitment to abandon its nuclear ambitions and allow free navigation through the strait. However, these incentives have not convinced Iranian leaders, leading to the continued use of negative pressure, such as a naval blockade of Iranian ports in the Gulf of Oman. This blockade aims to cut off Iran's access to global trade, but its long-term effects remain uncertain, and the impact on Iran's economy is difficult to gauge.