The United States is marking the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, a series of terrorist attacks that led to significant changes in national security policies and international relations. This milestone offers an opportunity to reflect on the past two and a half decades of counter-terrorism efforts, which have been accompanied by controversies surrounding human rights. Issues such as the use of torture, the establishment of secret detention facilities, and the application of alternative forms of justice have sparked debate and concern among legal experts and human rights advocates. Reed Brody, an American lawyer and former assistant district attorney in New York, has been involved in various legal and human rights initiatives. He previously served as an advisor to Human Rights Watch, a non-governmental organization that investigates and reports on human rights abuses worldwide. Brody's work has focused on holding governments accountable for actions that may violate international law and human rights standards. In a recent interview with Au Cœur de l'Info, a French news program, Brody discussed the implications of the United States' counter-terrorism policies over the past 25 years. He emphasized the tension between national security and the protection of civil liberties, highlighting the need for legal accountability and transparency in the fight against terrorism. His insights provide a critical perspective on the long-term consequences of policies implemented in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. The discussion around these issues remains relevant as countries continue to grapple with the balance between security and human rights. Brody's analysis underscores the importance of maintaining legal and ethical standards, even in the face of global threats. His participation in the interview reflects ongoing efforts to examine the impact of past policies and to guide future approaches to counter-terrorism in a manner that respects both security and justice.