Senator and farmer Laurent Duplomb recently spoke about the development of an emergency law aimed at protecting agricultural sovereignty and addressing key challenges in farming. The law, submitted by the government, is based on three main principles: managing water resources, dealing with predation by wildlife, and improving production means. One of the notable aspects of the law is the inclusion of the Duplomb 2 law, which was fully integrated into article 2. This law focuses on doubling water storage volumes for agriculture, along with measures that support water storage. The law has faced some opposition, with ecologist and insoumise deputies referring it to the Constitutional Council. The council largely validated the law, rejecting the censure requests and emphasizing that the general interest of the Nation was being served. Senator Duplomb expressed satisfaction with the law, particularly regarding water management. The Duplomb 1 law had made progress on several issues, but the current law has advanced further, especially in addressing phytosanitary products. Two specific products, acétamipride and flupyradifurone, have been reintroduced on an exceptional basis. Additionally, livestock norms were aligned with European standards through an ordinance on article 17. Duplomb expressed pride in the continuity of his work, which he has been pursuing for several years. He criticized overly restrictive rules, particularly those linked to agroecology and upscaling, which he believes are harming French agriculture. His greatest achievement is ending the overreach of norms, particularly on phytosanitary products, water, and predation by wolves. The reintroduction of the two phytosanitary products caused controversy, but Duplomb emphasized that it was necessary to avoid hypocrisy and danger to the agricultural sector. He believes that passing the Constitutional Council's review was a crucial step. The path to passing the law was challenging and full of obstacles. Duplomb clarified that he did not force any deputies or senators to support the law, despite the strong opposition from a minority. He stressed that the law passed because of the majority support, even though it was a difficult process. He also noted that many doubted his ability to rewrite the text, but he persisted and succeeded. Regarding feedback from the agricultural community, some farmers have concerns about the effectiveness of a price tunnel, which is intended to favor producers. Private dairy companies have expressed fears, but Duplomb acknowledges these concerns. He explained that the price tunnel aims to find a compromise among different stakeholders in the sector. If a compromise is not reached, the government may impose an administered price. The profession is now waiting for the implementing decrees of this emergency law. Duplomb noted that not all articles of the law require ministerial decrees. Some are directly applicable, such as the doubling of water storage volumes. A ministerial decree may be necessary for wetlands, expected before November. Other ordinances, such as those on livestock norms, should be obtained quickly. He expressed confidence in the implementation of the law.