Almost two months after the Ceuta crisis, Greece's Minister of Immigration and Asylum, Thanos Plevris, has suggested an "emergency mechanism" that would allow EU member states to temporarily set aside the standard asylum procedures in specific situations. This proposal was discussed during a ministerial meeting on Thursday, October 1st, in Luxembourg. The idea is to address what some describe as the "instrumentalization of migration flows," meaning the use of migration as a political or strategic tool. Greece has taken a leading role in challenging the current EU asylum system, according to recent reports. The proposed mechanism, however, has been criticized as potentially illegal under current EU law. It aims to give member states more flexibility in handling migration, especially in times of perceived crisis or external pressure. The push for this measure has come primarily from right-wing political parties across Europe, who argue that the current asylum system is too rigid and allows for abuse. These parties often advocate for stricter immigration controls and more national sovereignty in managing migration. The proposal has sparked debate over the balance between protecting human rights and maintaining national security. While the idea has gained traction among some EU member states, it remains controversial. Critics warn that such a mechanism could undermine the EU's collective commitment to protecting asylum seekers and could lead to a patchwork of policies across the bloc. The discussion highlights the ongoing tensions within the EU regarding migration and the rule of law.