In his book It is never too late to choose psychoanalysis, Jean-Pierre Winter explores why psychoanalysis continues to face resistance in modern society. He argues that psychoanalysis is not a quick fix or a set of techniques aimed at producing immediate results, but rather an experience centered on speech, desire, and the complexities of the human mind. Winter challenges common misunderstandings about psychoanalysis, including how it is practiced, the role of the analyst, and the structure of the therapeutic relationship. He suggests that resistance to psychoanalysis often comes from the analyst rather than the patient, countering the medical view that categorizes patients based on specific diagnoses. Winter emphasizes that psychoanalysis is not a universal solution or a medical therapy in the traditional sense. It is an experience that invites individuals to engage deeply with their own speech, truth, and desires. He notes that there are no inherent reasons why someone cannot undergo psychoanalysis, but analysts may not always be suitable for certain individuals. According to Winter, the legitimacy of an analyst comes not from external authorities or certifications but from the analyst's own self-awareness and personal engagement with the practice. This underscores the responsibility of analysts and the importance of their own analysis. A significant part of Winter's book is dedicated to the concept of the "art of silence" in psychoanalysis. He explains that the analyst's silence is not an absence but a deliberate mode of presence that allows the patient to speak freely, without immediate interpretation or guidance. This silence fosters a space for the patient to explore thoughts and feelings that may go beyond what they initially express. Winter counters the idea that psychoanalysis is cold or unhelpful, highlighting instead the depth and thoughtfulness of the analytic process. Winter also discusses the concept of transference, which he describes as both the driving force behind healing and a major source of resistance in the therapeutic process. He situates psychoanalysis within its cultural and political context, noting that in an era dominated by images, efficiency, and immediate results, psychoanalysis offers a different kind of experience—one that values time, speech without guarantees, and listening without quick solutions. Choosing psychoanalysis, he argues, is a deliberate act that goes against the current of modern society's fast-paced demands. The book also presents an ethical stance, addressing both future patients and analysts. Winter reminds readers that psychoanalysis is only meaningful for those who are willing to commit to its demands and engage deeply with its principles. His work has generated a range of responses, with some readers supporting his views, while others have referenced his other writings and debated his perspectives on topics such as family relationships, the role of the father, and Judaism. Some note that younger generations view psychoanalysis differently, sometimes as a kind of cult or a way of joining a specific group, while others remain skeptical or hostile due to factors like the lack of financial support or the influence of critiques from other psychological schools.