Brazil faces a complex political landscape as the Lula government, despite positive economic indicators such as reduced unemployment and controlled inflation, risks being overthrown this month by Bolsonaro's son, Flávio Bolsonaro. Christian Edward Cyril Lynch, a professor of political science at the Institute of Political and Social Studies of the State University of Rio de Janeiro (IESP-UERJ), notes that while Lula's government has made strides in social programs, his popularity remains lower than expected. Lynch attributes this to the public perception of a high cost of living, exacerbated by high interest rates and inflation, which harms the government's image. Unlike previous administrations, Lula did not use "packages of good measures" to counter this perception before an important election, a strategy that Bolsonaro employed in 2022. Recent adjustments to family allowances have been made in an emergency manner, but this has not significantly improved public sentiment. Beyond economic factors, Lynch highlights a broader sense of insecurity in Brazilian society, driven by technological advancements, deglobalization, and the resurgence of imperialist influences. He argues that Lula, a traditional figure associated with the 1988 democratic regime, offers a vision rooted in the past rather than one that addresses the anxieties of a younger generation. For many, the political landscape has been shaped by the ongoing rivalry between Bolsonaro and Lula, with the former's rise to power in 2018 and the latter's imprisonment creating a lasting divide. Lula's reliance on established political strategies, while effective in the past, is now seen as less relevant or inclusive in today's context. Lynch observes that the Brazilian extreme right has built a strong identity, particularly among the upper middle class, entrepreneurs, and evangelicals, who have largely moved away from traditional political engagement. The upcoming election may be decided by a small, undecided segment of the population, who often base their votes on current events rather than long-term political positions. This group, which does not engage with politics on a daily basis, could tip the balance in favor of Flávio Bolsonaro, who is seen as a continuation of his father's political legacy. The sociological composition of the Bolsonaro electorate has evolved significantly since 2018. Lynch notes that men continue to vote more for the extreme right, partly in response to the changing roles of women and the perceived loss of traditional masculinity. There is also a significant gender gap, with a 10-point difference in support between male and female voters. Religion plays a crucial role, as evangelicals, influenced by prosperity theology, strongly support Bolsonaro. This theological movement blends reactionary and libertarian ideologies, reinforcing the right's appeal. Regional differences also shape the political landscape. The southern regions of Brazil, where Bolsonarism is strongest, are influenced by a historical narrative that emphasizes European immigration and the idea that white immigrants and their descendants are the true workers of the country. This perspective fosters a negative and racist view of the Northeast, where Lula has made significant progress in improving living conditions. The southern electorate also embraces a subordinate position to the United States, desiring a status similar to Puerto Rico. This acceptance of a vassal-like position, combined with a strong entrepreneurial ethos, has further solidified the right's base. The links between the extreme right, the decline of Catholicism, and the rise of conservative and aggressive pentecostalism are also significant. Lynch explains that aggressive pentecostalism, originating from the United States, has gained traction by mixing religion with money and rejecting republican values. In contrast, the Catholic Church has struggled to adapt to contemporary capitalism, relying on pre-capitalist values. This has left a vacuum in the peripheries, where neo-pentecostal churches have stepped in, offering a range of services that the Catholic Church has not been able to provide due to its centralized structure and resistance to change. The political strategies and positions of Jair and Flávio Bolsonaro differ, though both are considered part of the extreme right. Jair Bolsonaro built his image around nostalgia for the military dictatorship and an anti-republican agenda, while Flávio presents himself as a more conventional right-wing politician. However, the Bolsonaro family's strong anti-Workers' Party stance ensures their continued influence on the right, shielding them from accusations of corruption. The current political climate in Brazil is marked by a shift towards depresidentialization, with the legislative branch gaining more power and autonomy, reducing the influence of the executive. This change in the political regime could have significant implications for the future of Brazilian democracy, especially in the event of a new authoritarian trend or violent contestation of an election result.