A legal battle over strike actions and foreign workers intensifies as Air Tahiti's lawyer argues the case is a 'manipulation' and 'instrumentalization of justice.'
Case postponed to Monday
The legal case involving Air Tahiti and the CSIP over the use of foreign workers during a strike has been postponed to Monday. The airline’s lawyer, Me Yves Piriou, said the delay is part of the normal legal process.Lawyer defends legal compliance
Me Yves Piriou argued that the situation involving foreign workers is "perfectly legal" and not an attempt to break the strike. He stated that there is "no situation that would be illegal" and that the actions taken by Air France and Air New Zealand are within the law.Late summons raises concerns
The lawyer noted that Air Tahiti received the legal summons late, after the court's specified deadline. He claimed that the bailiff intentionally avoided marking the time on the summons, but they have proof that the summons was delivered late.Legal process and response time
Me Yves Piriou emphasized that the case is an "hourly reference case," requiring thorough preparation. He assured the court that his team had prepared adequately and that the case was ready within the required timeframe.Postponement as normal procedure
He said that if the opposing side needs more time to respond, it is "perfectly normal" under the principle of contradiction. He called the situation "pure manipulation and poisoning" but acknowledged the need for legal fairness.Legal rights and labor law
The lawyer argued that Air New Zealand and Air France have the right to use their own personnel and equipment rented from Air Tahiti. He emphasized that only one employee from Air New Zealand was involved, with the rest of the work done by non-striking Air Tahiti employees.No strike-breaking, he claims
Me Yves Piriou insisted that there is "no situation that can be characterized as strike-breaking." He described the case as an attempt to pressure Air Tahiti during negotiations and claimed that the airline has fully respected the law.Legal analysis and confidence
After a detailed legal review, he said the elements presented by the applicants do not constitute any illegal activity. He expressed confidence in the airline’s legal position and said the case is "pure manipulation and poisoning."No criminal charges, he says
Regarding any criminal proceedings, Me Yves Piriou said there is "nothing" to support such claims. He noted that the labor inspection has not taken a position due to a lack of evidence and criticized the sharing of internal communications as an attempt to intimidate.Closing remarks
He concluded by quoting former French President Jacques Chirac, saying, "It touches one without moving the other," suggesting that the legal actions taken against Air Tahiti have not affected the airline’s position.