Curfews in French cities

Since the demonstrations on October 17, curfews have been implemented in several major French cities. Some prefectures have introduced these measures following incidents during the celebrations, and restrictions are expected to continue as the October 31 demonstrations approach. In Paris, a curfew for unaccompanied minors has been in place in certain areas from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. until Monday, November 2.

Public reaction to the curfew

Some residents are experiencing the curfew measures poorly, with reports of a sense of suffocation, anger, and frustration. Among those affected, some had not planned to be in the restricted areas during the curfew hours. This has led to confusion about why they feel their freedoms are being restricted, even if they are not directly impacted by the measure.

Psychological reaction to restrictions

Several studies have explored the concept of reactance, a psychological defense mechanism that people use to maintain their freedom when they perceive it as threatened. A study in the journal Zeitschrift für Psychologie found that perceived threats to freedom can lead to discomfort, hostility, anger, and resistance. Earlier research in Communication Monographs also highlighted the emotional impact of reactance, linking restrictions to negative emotions and thoughts.

Emotional effects of movement restrictions

Restrictions on movement can create a feeling of suffocation, as not being able to leave home as desired may lead to a sense of confinement or anxiety. The experience of confinement during the pandemic showed how movement limitations could create a similar sense of restriction. A 2021 study in Frontiers in Psychology collected testimonies that confirmed these emotional responses to restricted movement.

Perception of justification matters

Research indicates that the perception of a measure’s justification plays a key role in how people react to restrictions. A study in Frontiers in Psychology found that participants reacted more strongly to restrictions they viewed as illegitimate. When faced with an illegitimate prohibition, participants showed a rapid increase in heart rate, while those who saw the restriction as justified had a delayed reaction. This suggests that perceived injustice can trigger stronger emotional responses.