Misinformation on social media is increasingly influencing public perception about abortion, particularly in France. According to a recent report by the Family Planning Organization, access to abortion is becoming more difficult, and misleading content is prevalent online. One example is a Facebook group titled IVG: you are hesitating, come and talk about it, which appears to offer support but instead features testimonies from women who describe feeling "broken or destroyed" by their abortions. The group has over 100,000 followers and has spent more than 50,000 euros on advertising over five years, according to Meta’s public advertising reports. This visibility is deliberate, as the group aims to spread anti-abortion sentiment through emotionally charged content. The misinformation extends beyond Facebook and is also found on platforms like YouTube, X, and Instagram. A 2024 report by the Women's Foundation found that one in five videos about abortion contains misleading information. These videos are often shared by far-right, Catholic, and anti-LGBT groups, including accounts linked to anti-abortion activists and political figures such as Eric Zemmour and members of the March for Life association. This group, founded 20 years ago, advocates for the repeal of abortion rights in France. Efforts to combat this misinformation include a 2017 law that criminalizes hindering abortion through digital means, with penalties of up to two years in prison and a 30,000 euro fine. However, the law has not been enforced due to legal challenges and its limited scope, which focuses on websites rather than social media platforms. As a result, misinformation has moved to platforms like Facebook and Instagram, which are not included in the original law’s provisions. In response to the spread of anti-abortion content, some efforts are being made to promote accurate information. For example, users can now prioritize articles from Franceinfo in Google search results. Meanwhile, public discourse continues to highlight the challenges surrounding abortion access and the role of social media in shaping opinions. These discussions are part of a broader conversation about the intersection of technology, public health, and personal rights.