Jean-Louis Borloo and François Bayrou have returned to the political forefront eight months before the presidential election, each working to strengthen the center-right political coalition. Borloo is launching a tour called "République mechanics," aimed at bringing together individuals with expertise in government operations. Meanwhile, Bayrou continues to push for a wide-ranging primary that would include a range of parties, from the center-left PS to the conservative Gaullists. Both men emphasize that they are not seeking to run for president themselves but are instead building networks and proposing ideas to solidify the center-right bloc. The reemergence of Borloo and Bayrou highlights the challenge facing the center-right in finding a clear successor to President Emmanuel Macron. Current figures like Gabriel Attal and Édouard Philippe are trying to build their own support, but neither has emerged as a dominant leader. Unlike traditional political power structures, where a single figure might guide the selection of a future candidate, the current situation lacks a clear central authority. Borloo's team insists that his efforts are focused on assembling a network of skills and proposals rather than seeking a candidacy or an heir. Bayrou, on the other hand, continues to advocate for a primary that would bring together the center and moderate right, including social democrats, to prevent further division within the bloc. Sylvain Maillard, an MP for the Ensemble party, notes that while Bayrou still holds influence in shaping government policy and French politics, Borloo's impact is seen as less significant, despite his extensive network of contacts. The power of these figures lies not in direct control but in their ability to connect with a wide range of political actors, from parliamentarians to local officials and former colleagues. Erwan Balanant, a Modem MP, describes Borloo and Bayrou as "centers of gravity" within the political equation, noting that their credibility comes from their ability to engage with different parts of the moderate political spectrum. He cites Borloo’s previous work on urban policy and territorial development and Bayrou’s expertise in economic issues, such as debt, as examples of their past influence. Senator Xavier Iacovelli points out that before uniting the French public, political leaders must first unite the various factions they have governed with. The different elements of the center and moderate right, such as Renaissance, Horizons, and Modem, intend to preserve their individual identities. Figures like Borloo and Bayrou may play a crucial role later, when a potential candidate seeks to transform personal influence into a broad coalition, requiring intermediaries who can connect with various political groups. Iacovelli acknowledges that if there were an uncontested candidate, the need for such figures would be less urgent. Erwan Balanant similarly notes the lack of a unifying figure capable of bridging the gap between Gaullists and social democrats. While these former leaders can offer ideas, contacts, and guidance, they cannot determine the leader of the political family. Until a candidate emerges who can assert authority across the entire bloc, political figures will continue to consult those who understand the complex landscape of French politics.