VSA not used in October 17 demonstrations

Algorithmic video surveillance (VSA) was not deployed during the demonstrations that took place on October 17, according to available information. The technology, which uses AI-enhanced cameras to detect specific situations, was not activated in this context despite its expanded legal framework.

Ripost law extends VSA until 2030

The Ripost law, passed on August 18, 2026, extended the use of VSA until the end of 2030. This law allows the use of drones and footage from incidents such as looting, but it explicitly prohibits the use of biometric data, facial recognition, or automatic cross-referencing with police files.

VSA limited to specific events and locations

The VSA system was introduced as part of the planning for the Paris Olympics and is currently restricted to events like concerts, matches, and certain sensitive buildings. It does not apply to demonstrations, such as those against the high cost of living, which occurred in several French cities on October 17.

Legal limits on VSA implementation

The Constitutional Council has placed restrictions on VSA, limiting its use to a maximum of three months at any given site, with renewals allowed. The list of sites where VSA can be used must be approved by an order from the interior minister, and legal experts have been monitoring the process closely.

Drones used in demonstrations but with restrictions

While VSA was not used, drones were deployed during the October 17 demonstrations. Prefects authorized the use of drones in several locations, including parts of Hérault, Nancy, and Toulon. Drones operate under a different legal framework and are not allowed to capture sound or use facial recognition technology.

European AI Act and French law conflict

The European AI Act prohibits the use of real-time biometric identification in public spaces by law enforcement, except in specific cases. The Ripost law has relaxed this rule, allowing such technology to be used in the event of a serious and imminent threat to personal safety, with authorization granted quickly and formalized later.

VSA not helpful in investigating looting

Algorithmic video surveillance cannot legally assist in identifying those responsible for the looting that occurred on October 17. The investigation is relying on traditional methods, including reviewing surveillance footage and analyzing social media content.

Past misuse of video analysis software

There is a history of concern about the use of video analysis software by the police. An inspection report confirmed that the Briefcam software was used outside the legal framework from 2015 to 2023, leading to the wrongful identification of demonstrators in the past.

VSA effectiveness remains uncertain

The effectiveness of VSA is still in question. A committee evaluating the Olympic Games experience found mixed results, with no clear success in managing crowd movements, which are a key aspect of demonstrations. A deputy who reviewed security measures for the Games cited only one instance where the technology was useful.

Calls for transparency in VSA and drone use

The use of VSA and drones during demonstrations remains a topic of debate. President Emmanuel Macron has called for greater transparency, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines and oversight to ensure these technologies are used appropriately.