NASA grant delays cause research disruptions

Scientists funded by NASA are facing delays of up to a year before receiving approved grants, according to a report by the American Institute of Physics. These delays, which began during the second term of former President Donald Trump, have disrupted laboratory operations and hiring processes in the field of astrophysics.

New procedures slow down funding

The delays are attributed to new validation procedures implemented by NASA, which have created bottlenecks in the grant approval process. Between a quarter and a third of American astrophysicists are affected, and the situation is raising concerns about the future of scientific research and the development of new talent in the field.

Changes in language confuse researchers

Although NASA has not officially changed its grant rules, scientists have noticed a shift in the language used in notifications. Instead of proposals being labeled as "selected," they are now described as "eligible for a complementary examination." The process and its duration remain unclear, adding to the confusion among researchers.

Tracking system unavailable

The online system that scientists use to track their grants is currently offline, displaying a maintenance message without a specified date for restoration. This lack of transparency and access to information has further complicated the already slow grant approval process.

Personal impact on researchers

Teddy Kareta, a professor at Villanova University, submitted a transfer request for a grant in June 2025 but did not receive the funds until the spring of 2026. His experience highlights the significant delays affecting scientists, with colleagues noting that such payments used to take only three months or less before 2025.

Researcher receives grant after long wait

Kat Volk, a researcher at the Planetary Science Institute, received her grant in August 2026, four months after submitting her application. Her experience reflects the broader trend of extended delays, which are impacting both current research projects and the ability to recruit and retain new scientists in the field.