Recent legal reforms in France have introduced several changes to civil procedure and family law, aimed at making legal processes more efficient and reducing unnecessary delays. One of the key updates involves measures of instruction in futuro, which are now subject to a three-month execution period starting from the date of the court order. This period can be extended in complex cases. Additionally, any party contesting such measures has one month from the date they receive the order to request a judicial review. The reforms also address the process of changing names. Under Article 60 of the Civil Code, when a name change is ordered, the individual is now responsible for updating their civil status documents, such as identity cards and passports. Previously, in cases initiated by the public prosecutor, the responsibility for transmitting the change to the relevant authorities fell on the prosecutor. This change helps avoid procedural errors that could invalidate legal processes. Another important change is the introduction of mandatory mediation under Article 1533 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Both parties involved in a dispute must attend a meeting with a mediator or conciliator. If a party fails to attend without a valid reason, they could face a fine of up to 10,000 euros. The mediation period has also been extended from one month to three months, giving parties more time to resolve conflicts, especially in complex or emotionally charged cases. In nationality disputes, the responsibility of informing the Ministry of Justice has shifted from the parties involved to the public prosecutor. This change aims to prevent procedural mistakes that could lead to invalid legal actions due to forgotten formalities. The PARDI (procédure d'admission rapide des demandes incontestées) allows judges to rule on uncontested claims if the defendant does not appear in court, provided the claim is admissible and does not violate public order or fundamental rights. This change is intended to reduce the workload on courts by allowing quicker resolutions in cases where the defendant does not contest the claim. However, it has raised concerns about the adequacy of protections for vulnerable individuals who may not fully understand the legal process or have the resources to participate effectively. The new procedure also requires updated summons to inform defendants that a judgment might be issued based solely on the claimant’s evidence. These reforms are part of a broader initiative known as Magicobus III, which aims to streamline civil procedures and reduce the burden on courts. While the changes are expected to make legal processes more efficient, they also introduce new procedural considerations for legal professionals and their clients.