The arXiv platform, which is one of the oldest and most widely used platforms for sharing scientific research before it is formally published, is tightening its rules for submitting articles. This is due to a growing number of articles generated by artificial intelligence (AI). These AI-generated articles are putting a strain on the teams that manage preprint platforms. This situation has become evident with the case of Nicholas Polson, a researcher who has submitted over 200 preprints since the beginning of the year, mostly on the Elsevier platform SSRN. In October 2025, arXiv decided to stop accepting preprints that are synthesis or argumentative articles on AI, restricting acceptance only to articles that present new scientific findings in this area. In May 2024, arXiv introduced a specific rule regarding AI use: a one-year suspension for those who submit AI-generated articles that have not been clearly verified. After this suspension, arXiv only accepts articles signed by the author if they have been accepted by journals or conferences. These measures have not been enough to curb the rise in submissions, especially in the field of AI. arXiv notes that for other fields, the number of submissions has doubled since January 2024. Limiting the number of submissions per user is becoming more necessary. Before AI tools became widely available, there was a clear practical limit on how many articles an individual could produce and submit independently. Volunteer moderators on arXiv limited the number of submissions from authors who significantly exceeded this threshold. However, with AI tools becoming more advanced and accessible, the 'practical limit' of the number of articles that can be submitted is now being debated. Since arXiv relies on volunteers, a small number of authors submit a large number of low-quality articles, which take up a disproportionate amount of the moderators' time. This is unfair to authors who submit high-quality articles, as their submissions can face delays of several days or even weeks. To address this, arXiv has implemented a limit of two submissions per month (calendar month) per author, as well as a limit of three submissions pending verification. This applies regardless of whether the submitted articles have been previously rejected. The platform also reminds users that "articles submitted to arXiv must present original, innovative, and significant research work, constituted as a coherent whole and falling within the categories of arXiv." By imposing this strict limit on the number of submissions per author, arXiv appears to have found an effective way to manage the flood of submissions. It is not easy to create an account on the platform, and an author who wants to submit more articles cannot bypass the restriction by creating a new account. Thus, each person is limited to submitting a maximum of two articles to arXiv in a month, which is already a significant limit compared to the average publication rate of researchers in scientific journals.