In 2024, over 11.7 million points were removed from the driving licenses of French citizens, largely due to automatic radar speed enforcement. According to the National Institute for the Study of Road Safety (ONISR), automatic radars issued 13.9 million penalty notices that year, with nearly 70 percent of these linked to minor speeding violations of less than 20 km/h. These systems often fail to identify the driver, particularly motorcyclists, which makes it easier for them to challenge the infractions detected by such technology. Motorcyclists are increasingly using specialized websites, artificial intelligence, or hiring lawyers to contest these fines. Antoine Regley, a lawyer specializing in road law, explains that in theory, a motorcyclist cannot be found guilty if they contest the infraction. He recalls only two instances in fifteen years where motorcyclists were condemned after contesting, both involving additional evidence such as geolocation data and matching clothing. One reader who was flashed while riding a motorcycle for a minor speeding violation used AI to draft a contestation letter, citing only one article of the Road Code, L121-3. This letter led to the case being classified without further action and the reimbursement of the 135 euro deposit. The General Directorate of National Police (DGPN) stated that the holder of the vehicle registration certificate is financially responsible for the fine due to the inability to prove the driver's identity. However, the DGPN also noted that it is a common practice to summon individuals to the police station to identify the driver or the person who had the keys to the vehicle. Regley emphasizes that if contestations are not classified without further action, individuals may be summoned to the police station, where they have the right to remain silent. He also notes that if there is no possibility of identifying the person, authorities must acquit. Despite these practices, the Federation of Angry Motorcyclists (FFMC) cautions against systematically contesting rules, even though they oppose the automatic fines, which they argue serve only to generate revenue. They stress the importance of personal responsibility and accepting mistakes when they occur. However, Regley warns that contesting fines through AI or specialized websites may not always be effective, especially for major speeding violations, where interrogation is likely. In such cases, he advises seeking legal representation.