Science journalism is facing significant challenges, including job losses and the closure of long-standing publications, as traditional media grapples with economic and technological changes. In 1986, two well-known science magazines stopped publishing, marking what was then called a "science crash" after a period of growth known as the "science boom." Today, similar concerns are emerging, with major outlets such as Scientific American, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, National Public Radio, and CBS News reducing their science and environmental reporting teams. In late June 2026, Scientific American was acquired by new owners who immediately laid off 15 employees and reduced the salaries of many others. This decline in science journalism is part of a larger transformation in the media industry. Between 2000 and 2025, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported a loss of about 80% of U.S. newspaper jobs, compared to around 65% of jobs in the publishing of periodicals. The rise of the internet has changed how people consume information, with online sources now surpassing television as the primary way the public learns about science. Additionally, advertising revenue has largely moved online, further straining traditional print media. Despite these challenges, science communication has found new life through online platforms, social media, and video content. For example, Mark Rober, a former NASA engineer who now creates content on YouTube, has amassed a large following with his engaging science videos. However, this shift has raised concerns about the accuracy and depth of science information, as much of the content online is not vetted by journalists and is often influenced by commercial interests rather than journalistic standards. The decline of science magazines is also clear. Out of 29 prominent popular science magazines that were created in the United States since the 19th century, only 11 remain today. Eight of these have closed since the year 2000. Popular Science, once distributed to over 1 million readers monthly as recently as 2011, has shifted to digital-only content, offering online articles, podcasts, and other digital formats. National Geographic has also faced difficulties, with layoffs and the end of its monthly newsstand sales in 2023. While some concerns about the current state of science journalism may reflect a broader sense of unease, they also point to real challenges in the field. Scholars studying science journalism note that while the industry has faced setbacks, it has also adapted through new formats and training programs. The future of science journalism will depend on its ability to innovate and adjust to the evolving media landscape, ensuring that accurate, reliable science reporting continues to reach the public.