Donald Trump, the former U.S. president, developed a defense strategy influenced by his mentor, the lawyer Roy Cohn, who was known for his aggressive legal tactics. This approach became a hallmark of Trump's career, whether in business as a real estate developer or in politics during his presidential campaigns. His strategy can be summarized in three key principles: "1) Attack. Attack. Attack. 2) Acknowledge nothing. Deny everything in bulk. 3) Claim victory and never admit defeat." These tactics were central to his political rise and were particularly evident during his successful 2015 and 2023 campaigns, as well as his 2019 campaign, which ended in defeat. In recent years, the strategy of using falsehoods as a political tool has become a defining feature of Trump's approach to power. He placed the use of misinformation at the center of his actions, using it as a driving force in his efforts to regain influence. This approach has resonated with leaders in other countries, including Jordan Bardella, the president of the far-right French political party National Rally. Bardella has adopted Trump's methods to respond to revelations by the investigative outlet Mediapart about Bardella's past antisemitic writings from his youth. Bardella's response to these revelations has been to attack the credibility of the source, deny the allegations broadly, and assert his position as a victor in the controversy. This mirrors Trump's own tactics when facing criticism or legal challenges. The question now is whether Bardella's leader, Marine Le Pen, will follow a similar path in her own political strategies. Le Pen, who has long been associated with the far-right and has drawn inspiration from Trump's rhetoric, may find such tactics useful in her own political battles. The use of these strategies raises concerns about the spread of misinformation and the erosion of trust in political discourse. As leaders in different countries adopt similar approaches, the impact on public perception and democratic processes remains a topic of debate among analysts and observers.