French Senate reviews controversial bill

The French Senate started reviewing the "casseurs-payeurs" bill on October 27, as social tensions remain high. The proposed law, which aims to hold demonstrators accountable for damages caused during protests, has sparked debate over its impact on freedom of expression and assembly.

Bill establishes collective responsibility

The bill's first article, approved by the Senate, introduces collective responsibility for participants in violent demonstrations. It allows authorities to claim compensation from individuals involved in such events, even if they were not directly responsible for the damage observed.

Legislation born from past unrest

Originally designed to address disturbances after a football match in May, the bill faced interruptions due to violent protests on October 17. Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez argued the law is necessary to ensure those causing damage also pay for it, calling it a matter of common sense.

Right and center support tougher measures

The bill was strengthened by the right and center majority in the Senate, incorporating recommendations from a committee focused on maintaining public order. However, critics argue it infringes on the right to demonstrate, calling it a major legal overreach.

New legal regime and liability limits

Article 1 introduces a new legal framework allowing participants in violent demonstrations to be held collectively responsible, even without proof of direct involvement. The liability per person is capped at 10,000 euros, with higher limits rejected by the Senate.

Exemptions for peaceful participants

The Senate version includes exemptions for individuals like independent observers or "street medics" who assist during protests. A government amendment to limit these exemptions to professional journalists was rejected.

New restrictions on violent demonstrators

The bill includes measures to restrict individuals who have previously engaged in violent protests. These include bans on participating in demonstrations or appearing in public spaces. Penalties for inciting violence and organizing banned demonstrations have also been increased.

Controversy over platform content removal

The bill allows authorities to request the removal of content promoting violence or destruction from online platforms within 24 hours. Critics argue this infringes on freedom of expression, while supporters claim it is necessary for public safety.

Left-wing opposition and constitutional concerns

The left strongly opposes the bill, criticizing it as a security-driven response to social unrest. They argue it fails to address the root causes of the demonstrations and question its constitutionality. Some senators have called for the left to refrain from acting as constitutional judges.

Controversial provisions remain

The bill still includes contentious elements, such as Article 4, which proposes deducting damages from social benefits like family allowances or housing assistance. This provision is expected to be debated further on Wednesday.