Historian Aïcha Limbada has pointed out that sexual violence committed by cousins—family members who are responsible for one in five such cases within close family relationships—was not traditionally considered incestuous. This distinction has important legal and social implications, as incestuous relationships are typically defined as those between individuals who are closely related by blood or marriage, such as parents and children or siblings. However, the legal definition has not always included cousins, leaving a gap in how such cases are addressed and prosecuted. Limbada's research highlights a significant oversight in how sexual violence within families is categorized. By not classifying cousin-related abuse as incestuous, legal systems may fail to provide the same level of protection or legal recourse for victims as they would in cases involving closer familial relationships. This has sparked discussions about the need for more inclusive definitions and stronger legal frameworks to address all forms of familial sexual abuse. A comprehensive law against sexual violence is currently under review by the National Assembly. This proposed legislation aims to address various forms of sexual violence, including those that occur within family settings. If passed, the law could bring about a more accurate classification of such crimes and ensure that all victims receive the legal support they deserve, regardless of the familial relationship involved. The proposed law also reflects a broader societal shift towards recognizing and addressing the complexities of familial abuse. As awareness of these issues grows, legal and social institutions are being called upon to adapt their definitions and responses to better serve victims and prevent future instances of abuse. This evolving legal landscape underscores the importance of ongoing research and advocacy in the field of sexual violence.