France has passed new laws that allow assisted dying, a decision that has led to strong discussions about ethics and public values. The law, approved in the summer of 2026, sets the rules for when and how individuals can receive help to end their lives, but opinions among the public and politicians are still divided. The legislation will be debated in the Senate this autumn after being passed in the first stage by the National Assembly. While it provides a legal framework for assisted dying, it also raises questions about the line between medical care and euthanasia. The ethical issues around the law have been examined by various experts and thinkers. In his book The Philosophers Die Too, Simon Critchley looks at the deaths of 190 famous philosophers, exploring whether philosophy can help people deal with the concept of death. He suggests that death, like sleep, removes individuals from the world, but whether it should be hastened for those in pain is still a matter of debate. Guillaume Durand, a philosopher who focuses on bioethics, has offered a detailed analysis of the topic, pointing out the challenges in setting ethical limits for assisted dying. Meanwhile, Christiane Hessel, the widow of Stéphane Hessel, chose to end her life through euthanasia in Belgium on December 14, highlighting the deeply personal and emotional aspects of the issue. In literature, Rebeka Warrior’s debut novel, All Lives, tells the story of her partner’s death, reflecting on the emotional impact of end-of-life decisions. The new legislation represents a shift in both society and philosophy, marking the beginning of an era where assisted dying is legally accepted. However, the philosophical and ethical questions surrounding it continue to be widely discussed.