In a recent development, the president of RN and his supporters have chosen to reject the evidence provided by the French investigative outlet Mediapart. This decision has drawn comparisons to the tactics used by proponents of the "post-truth" movement, which prioritizes emotion and personal belief over factual accuracy in public discourse. Mediapart is known for its in-depth journalism and has previously uncovered significant stories in French politics and society. The evidence it presented appears to challenge the narrative supported by the president of RN and his allies, prompting them to deny its validity despite its credibility. The "post-truth" concept, which gained prominence in political and media discussions, describes a situation where objective facts are less influential on public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief. This approach has been criticized for undermining democratic processes and the role of factual information in shaping public policy. This situation highlights a growing concern about the influence of misinformation and the rejection of factual evidence in contemporary political discourse. As debates over truth and trust continue to evolve, the role of independent journalism remains crucial in providing accurate information to the public.