In his new book Conspirator in Chief, historian Stephen F. Knott explores the idea that U.S. presidents have, throughout history, sometimes been involved in or influenced by conspiracy theories. Knott argues that this is not a new phenomenon but rather a recurring theme in the American political landscape. He joins The Takeout to discuss his findings and the implications of his research. Knott’s book examines how various presidents, from the early days of the republic to the modern era, have either promoted, believed in, or been surrounded by conspiracy theories. These range from suspicions about foreign interference to elaborate plots against the government. Knott notes that while some of these theories have been debunked, others have had real political consequences, shaping public opinion and policy decisions. During the interview, Knott emphasizes that his goal is not to criticize any particular president but to provide a historical perspective on how conspiracy thinking has influenced the presidency. He highlights that while some leaders have used such theories to rally support or justify actions, others have been victims of conspiracy-mongering by their political opponents. Knott also discusses how the current political climate has made conspiracy theories more prevalent than ever, with the internet and social media amplifying such narratives. He suggests that understanding this history is crucial for the public to discern fact from fiction in today’s political discourse.