The French teachers' union has strongly criticized the government's handling of recent protests by high school students, calling the response "brutal." The union pointed out that students had expressed "legitimate anger" over issues such as education policies and living conditions, but the authorities responded with measures that included the use of tear gas, forceful arrests, and non-lethal weapons that caused serious injuries. These tactics have drawn sharp criticism from both the public and legal experts. In a recent court ruling, judges expressed concern over how the government handled the situation, particularly highlighting the role of Gérald Darmanin, the French minister of the interior. The court pointed out that Darmanin did not pursue a "de-escalation strategy," which could have helped to calm tensions and avoid the use of excessive force. This failure to manage the situation peacefully has raised questions about the government's approach to dealing with youth protests. The protests have been part of a broader movement among French students, who have been demonstrating against a range of issues, including education reforms and rising living costs. The demonstrations have sometimes turned violent, with clashes between students and police. However, critics argue that the government's response has only worsened the situation, leading to more unrest and public dissatisfaction. The situation has sparked a national debate about how to handle youth protests and the balance between maintaining public order and respecting the rights of demonstrators. Legal experts and civil society groups have called for a more measured and dialogue-based approach, emphasizing the importance of addressing the underlying issues that drive student protests. As the debate continues, the government faces pressure to reconsider its strategy in dealing with youth activism.