Students who attend private institutions often seem to have better starting points in their careers compared to those from public institutions. However, socio-economist Fanette Merlin suggests that these differences can be attributed to the characteristics of the programs and the backgrounds of their students. When comparing programs with similar features and student demographics, Merlin points out that private programs typically do not provide significant advantages in terms of helping students integrate into the professional world. In many cases, the opposite is true. Merlin's research highlights that factors such as the quality of education, available resources, and the overall environment of the institution play a crucial role in shaping a student's career prospects. These elements can vary significantly between private and public institutions, influencing the outcomes of their graduates. The findings challenge the common assumption that private education inherently leads to better career opportunities. Instead, they emphasize the importance of considering the specific characteristics of each program and the backgrounds of the students enrolled in them. This perspective encourages a more nuanced understanding of educational outcomes and career success. Merlin's work underscores the need for a more detailed analysis of educational institutions and their impact on students' professional futures. It suggests that the type of institution alone is not the determining factor in career success, but rather a combination of various factors that influence a student's development and opportunities.