The topic of the veil has resurfaced as France prepares for the official start of the electoral campaign for the presidential election. The National Rally (RN), a political party in France, has once again included in its program a proposal to ban the wearing of the veil in public spaces. Under this proposal, women who wear the veil—whether by choice or under pressure—would face legal consequences, including fines. This policy has sparked debate over its implications for personal freedoms and religious expression. Jean Carbonnier, a jurist, historian, and Protestant theologian, has stressed the need for caution in legislative action. He refers to an "eleventh commandment" for lawmakers: "You will legislate only with trembling hands." This principle highlights the importance of ensuring that proposed laws align with the rule of law, fundamental rights, and the independence of judicial institutions. Carbonnier argues that any legislation should be carefully evaluated to avoid undermining the balance between state authority and individual freedoms. The proposed ban on the veil directly conflicts with Article 10 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which states that "No one shall be disturbed on account of his opinions, even religious ones, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law." The French law on the separation of churches and the state also reinforces the principle of freedom of conscience, emphasizing that the Republic ensures freedom of belief rather than enforcing dress codes. Critics argue that such a law would add to the existing discrimination faced by Muslim communities in France. In Le Monde on September 16, 2026, the rector of the Great Mosque of Paris addressed the potential consequences of such legislation. Christine Lazerges, a professor of criminal law and former deputy, has also commented on the issue, though her views do not represent the editorial stance of Réforme, the publication she is associated with. The debate surrounding the veil continues to reflect broader discussions on secularism, religious freedom, and the role of the state in personal expression.