Nissan's electric Micra is too similar to Renault's 5, prompting Renault to rethink its partnership strategies with Nissan, Ford, and Mitsubishi.
Nissan Micra's similarity to Renault 5 criticized
The Nissan Micra electric, built using Renault's technical platform, has drawn criticism for being too similar to the Renault 5. At the Paris Salon, François Provost, Renault's general director, admitted that the company did not push for enough differentiation between its models and those of its partners.Design similarities raise concerns
The interior of the Nissan Micra is nearly identical to that of the Renault 5, with the main differences limited to the front and rear lighting. This has led to the Micra being seen as a very close cousin of the Renault model rather than a distinct product.Renault cites successful differentiation examples
François Provost referenced the Twingo and the Dacia Spring, which share the same platform but are clearly distinguishable. He emphasized that the future Nissan Pixo, based on the Twingo, should follow a similar approach to ensure it is not mistaken for another model.Ford partnership involves joint development
Renault and Ford are collaborating on two electric models for Europe, using Renault's Ampere platform. The designs will be developed jointly, but Ford will retain control over the final look. François Provost stressed that the resulting car must clearly be a Ford.Confidentiality limits preview of Ford models
Due to confidentiality agreements, Renault cannot review Ford's design choices in advance. This means differentiation will depend on trust between the two companies and Ford's decisions. No images of the upcoming Ford model have been released yet.Mitsubishi models also face similarity issues
Mitsubishi already sells models derived from Renault vehicles, such as the Eclipse Cross, which shares its architecture with the Renault Scénic. Renault claims the models are based on different platforms, but Auto Plus argues they look very similar.Differentiation increases costs
François Provost acknowledged that making models more distinct increases production costs. Renault has offered customization options to partners, but prefers long-term collaborations over short-term contracts that require more changes. This approach aims to ensure each model has its own unique features.Questions remain about future collaborations
The new approach raises questions about how much differentiation is necessary for consumers to recognize distinct models and who will cover the additional costs. These rules will apply to future projects with Nissan, Ford, and Mitsubishi, but the already-released Nissan Micra will remain unchanged.